Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
| Blogs > rm_TheJoysOfSex > My Blog |
Conversation Fail # 1
|
Conversation Fail # 1 Here are some things I am not looking for (naturally out of respect to the person who messaged me, despite their lack of respect for me, I have blocked their name). Conversation was left unedited, grammar and syntax left unchanged. Comments to follow at the bottom: CF # 1: i have and love to fuck sexy Korean women  Me: I'm sure CF # 1: im in LA all the time too CF # 1: how is ur weekend? Me: it has been great Me: thank you Me: yours? CF # 1: i got up very early CF # 1: long week CF # 1: what is ur name? CF # 1: im CF # 1 (see what I did there?) Me: I'm (you will get my name if you message me and we speak )Me: I did too CF # 1: u look very nice CF # 1: maybe we can meet and see? CF # 1: what do u enjoy the most? Me: what do I enjoy most? CF # 1: i like to lick CF # 1: lol Me: that's wonderful CF # 1: women say I'm really good at it lol CF # 1: u shave or trim? CF # 1: natural? Me: CF # 1, I'm going to go. I hope you have a great day CF # 1: did i say something?? CF # 1: i hope we get a chance to meet and see Me: to be quite honest, I find this conversation incredibly boring CF # 1: well, i don't want to come a cross too strong CF # 1: im not sure what u are like CF # 1: some don't like it at first Me: before asking anything about me, getting to know me, you jumped to sex Me: I find that boring CF # 1: i was going off ur profile, sorry CF # 1: i do want to know the person Me: because I like to fuck doesn't mean I can't have a conversation first CF # 1: u are right CF # 1: tell me about yourself CF # 1: i really do and i do ask what u are all about CF # 1: what do u do for fun? Me: CF # 1, I am receiving a lot of messages from people who are currently in California and I would prefer to speak to them CF # 1: is there a time we can chat? Im in LA all the time and think u are a very attractive lady and u do seem nice CF # 1: i travel for a living Me: maybe message me another time but now you're being borderline disrespectful when I'm trying to be polite Me: I said I would prefer not to speak to you at this moment Me: have a great day So where to begin. Ok. I'm not an idiot. I realize if you message me you want to fuck me. My picture is me sitting in bed, barely clothed, it is a personals website and I indicated I want to fuck. Rest assured, if there is contact between us there is an understanding of interest there. Sex is implied. Next, try speaking to me like a person, please. I know you want to fuck me (see above paragraph) so lets see if we have a connection. Last, try to be in state. I have much better things to do than to run around trying to make plans to fuck you on June 22nd because you'll be here for 3 hours that day in the morning. |
||||
|
Words well written!! Welcome to Blog Land!!!
| |||
|
"I realize if you message me you want to fuck me" Not sure how many times I heard this in a bar or club by simply saying hello to a woman. On the internet, the assumption is always present and on sites like these, proliferated and often validated by a handful of jackasses through the ignorant and direct treatment of the sites as whore houses. But then, you allowed the conversation to go on for 42 comments. And, by the first comment he made, 41 comments too many. Why did you continue after the obvious and mind numbing stupidity of his opening comment? Nonetheless, the assumption that simply saying hello, trying to initiate a conversation or even asking you out on a date translates and validates such a preconceived assumption that means "the man wants to fuck you" has its impact not only on your tolerance "for continuing the conversation above" but more so on your ability to meet a man that simply wants to "get to know you - for who you are and nothing else" before determining whether you're even worthy of his time and effort. You obviously invited the conversation to go in the direction it went. Or, you would have "hung up the phone" as they say. The saddest thing is, this approach of assumptions are easily applied here with "just because I make this entry, I want to fuck you". Nothing could be farther from the truth. Many men will simply open with "Hello". Its up to you whether you engage and apparently from the message above you're engaging with the idiots on the site. In the case above, it is no more or less obvious you allowed the conversation to go on so you could publish the contents. The latter, is "red flag #1" - leading to the question "if I try to talk to you in IM, are you going to record the conversation and publish it later?" Perhaps you would be better off initiating the conversation than accepting them. But if that happens, should the men you contact assume "you only want to fuck them"? At 37, its time to grow up or you'll be 47 or 57 wondering why your still single or with tied into some jackass because you assumed the other guy that fumbled with his initial words just wanted to fuck you. (The same goes for the idiot jackass males on site)
| |||
|
Immature? No! Assertive and blunt – absolutely. Know it all? No! But smart enough to see the forest through the trees. Sorry you didn’t like the reference but if it fits…. “Attached” is not “married” so you are single for all practical purposes. I could be wrong. Attached to you could mean I’m married but don’t want to say so while leaving your options open to dup some guy who would not otherwise approach a married woman. Besides, the profile indicated you have a boyfriend and clearly states: “However, this is really more about me.” So are your feet getting tire with your current “attached” or are you playing the field (double timing) looking for something better that might come along before cutting ties? But I did not need to read your profile (and didn’t) to see or comment on the obvious. I was right on point and stayed on point with the cause and effect… of which was “women who assume that all men, for merely looking at them - want to fuck them”. This was directly from your words and the image posted. There was nothing polite about his opening comment and the suggestion that a woman should be polite, or even allow such a conversation to go that far when the opening line was nothing but vile is misplaced and terribly misguided for most women. From the opening line, did you really expect it to anywhere before you got bored? Having read your profile, I might have found you approachable for nothing more than your PhD and for nothing more than conversation. Having read this blog entry, would have reversed that interest. But the process was reversed and the loss of interest came first for nothing more than the assumption – as illustrated and written in the blog. As far as “working their way through a conversation” and “giving this fool a chance” your feel good approach did nothing more than encourage him to try that approach again. And, you did little to direct the conversation to subject matter you might find acceptable. A PhD doesn’t come with common sense. You either have it or you don’t. Which is it for you? Now! I’m being sarcastic in plain ProfessorNaught speak! But my observations were right on target and maybe worthy of being considered by any women that assumes all men want to fuck them. Since the real definition of being attractive (even for a romp n fuck) requires a lot more than physical appearance or a college sheepskin that says PhD. At least by any man that's a real man. Otherwise, these women are likely to settle for someone that falls short of what they deserve.
| |||
|
wild as hell
| |||
|
It's truly unfortunate all of this is taken so personal that the actual point(s) get overlooked. Which, by the way, you walked around and never addressed. (that's also being observant) Best of luck...
|
Become a member to create a blog
